4.2 Article

Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Hydroxyapatite/Epoxide Acrylate Maleic Compound Construction for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1477-1481

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001410

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite/epoxide acrylate maleic compound construction; computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing; craniomaxillofacial bone defects; reconstruction

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [S30206]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81001206]
  3. Research Fund of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai City [10JC1408700]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai City [10ZR1418000]
  5. Research Fund of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [2009077]
  6. Combined Engineering and Medicine Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2010MS55]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing hydroxyapatite (HA)/epoxide acrylate maleic (EAM) compound construction artificial implants for craniomaxillofacial bone defects. Computed tomography, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and three-dimensional reconstruction, as well as rapid prototyping were performed in 12 patients between 2008 and 2013. The customized HA/EAM compound artificial implants were manufactured through selective laser sintering using a rapid prototyping machine into the exact geometric shapes of the defect. The HA/EAM compound artificial implants were then implanted during surgical reconstruction. Color-coded superimpositions demonstrated the discrepancy between the virtual plan and achieved results using Geomagic Studio. As a result, the HA/EAM compound artificial bone implants were perfectly matched with the facial areas that needed reconstruction. The postoperative aesthetic and functional results were satisfactory. The color-coded superimpositions demonstrated good consistency between the virtual plan and achieved results. The three-dimensional maximum deviation is 2.12 +/- 0.65 mm and the three-dimensional mean deviation is 0.27 +/- 0.07 mm. No facial nerve weakness or pain was observed at the follow-up examinations. Only 1 implant had to be removed 2 months after the surgery owing to severe local infection. No other complication was noted during the follow-up period. In conclusion, computer-aided, individually fabricated HA/EAM compound construction artificial implant was a good craniomaxillofacial surgical technique that yielded improved aesthetic results and functional recovery after reconstruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available