4.0 Article

Plant size, sex expression and sexual reproduction along an elevation gradient in a desert moss

Journal

BRYOLOGIST
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 277-288

Publisher

AMER BRYOLOGICAL LICHENOLOGICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745-114.2.277

Keywords

bryophyte ecology; sex ratio; moss; Mojave Desert; dioecy; biomass

Categories

Funding

  1. National Geographic Society through the Missouri Botanical Garden [5429-95]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three prominent life history patterns attributed to dioecious species of mosses (low sex expression, male rarity, and low frequencies of sexual reproduction) were investigated in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis along an elevation gradient in the Spring Mountains of the Mojave Desert (U.S.A.). Low elevation patches exhibited significantly lower frequencies of sex expression, individuals with fewer inflorescences, and fewer male individuals. Sexual reproduction was infrequent at all elevations, with only seven of 85 patches showing evidence of recent sporophyte production and only nine of 708 perichaetia being fertilized. After factoring out abortive sporophytes, the percentage of patches maturing sporophytes was 5.9% and the estimated fraction of fertilized perichaetia was 0.7%. In addition, as elevation increased from low to middle/high elevation, individuals of Syntrichia caninervis exhibited significant increases in biomass, total stem length, number of ramets, and ramet length. The decreased availability of water at lower elevations may stunt individual plant size, inhibiting sex expression, and promoting growth of female-only individuals, thereby depressing sexual reproduction. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that male rarity may be caused in part by differential desiccation tolerance between the sexes, with males less able to tolerate repeated cycles of hydration and desiccation due to their higher energetic requirements for sex expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available