4.6 Article

Clinical significance of liver ischaemia after pancreatic resection

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages 1760-1765

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7675

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Liver ischaemia after pancreatic resection is a rare but potentially serious complication. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of postoperative liver ischaemia after pancreatic resection. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection between January 2007 and August 2008 in the Department of Surgery in Heidelberg were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected database and analysed with a focus on postoperative hepatic perfusion failure. Laboratory data, computed tomography (CT) findings, symptoms, therapy and outcome were recorded. Results: A total of 762 patients underwent pancreatic resection in the study period. Seventeen patients (2.2 per cent) with a postoperative increase in liver enzymes underwent contrast-enhanced CT for suspected liver perfusion failure. The types of perfusion failure were hypoperfusion without occlusion of major hepatic vessels (6 patients) and ischaemia with arterial (5) and/or portal vein (6) involvement. The overall mortality rate was 29 per cent (5 of 17 patients). Therapy included conservative treatment (7), radiological or surgical revascularization and necrosectomy or resection of necrotic liver tissue (10). Outcome varied from full recovery (4 patients) to moderate systemic complications (6) and severe complications (7) including death. Simultaneous involvement of the portal vein and hepatic artery was always fatal. Conclusion: Postoperative liver perfusion failure is a rare but potentially severe complication following pancreatic surgery requiring immediate recognition and, if necessary, radiological or surgical intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available