4.6 Article

Inhibitory effect of rapamycin and dexamethasone on production of IL-17 and IFN-γ in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 249-253

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.142489

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2005B60302009]
  2. Key project of Natural Science Foundation [30630064]
  3. International Cooperation in Science and Technology
  4. Guangdong Province [2006A50107001]
  5. National supporting project of PR China [2007BAI18B10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the effect of rapamycin (RAPA) and dexamethasone (DEX) on the production of IL-17 and IFN-gamma by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) patients and healthy individuals. Methods: Blood samples were drawn from 10 active VKH patients and 10 healthy individuals. PBMCs were cultured with or without anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies in the presence or absence of different concentrations of RAPA or DEX for 72 h. IL-17 and IFN-gamma concentrations in the supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The expression of IL-17 and IFN-gamma was significantly increased in active VKH patients compared with that in healthy controls. Both RAPA and DEX were able to significantly inhibit the production of IL-17 and IFN-gamma by PBMCs from patients and healthy controls. RAPA was able to completely inhibit IL-17 production at a dosage of 10 ng/ml but only partially suppressed IFN-gamma production even at a much higher concentration (1000 ng/ml). DEX inhibited the production of both IL-17 and IFN-gamma by approximately 70%. Conclusions: This study indicates that both RAPA and DEX inhibit the production of IL-17 and IFN-gamma by PBMCs. RAPA is much stronger in inhibiting the production of IL-17 than DEX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available