4.4 Article

Body composition in older community-dwelling adults with hip fracture: portable field methods validated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages 1219-1229

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512003170

Keywords

Body composition; Older adults; Hip fracture; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ageing is associated with weight loss and subsequently poor health outcomes. The present study assessed agreement between two field methods, bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and corrected arm muscle area (CAMA) for assessment of body composition against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the reference technique. Agreement between two predictive equations estimating skeletal muscle mass (SMM) from BIS against SMM from DXA was also determined. Assessments occurred at baseline <14 d post-surgery (n 79), and at 6 months (6M; n 75) and 12 months (12M; n 63) in community-living older adults after surgical treatment for hip fracture. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between BIS and DXA, CAMA and DXA and the equations and DXA were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses. Mean bias and LOA for fat-free mass (FFM) between BIS and DXA were: baseline, 0.7 (-10.9, 12.4) kg; 6M, -0.5 (-20.7, 19.8) kg; 12M, 0.1 (-8.7, 8.9) kg and for SMM between CAMA and DXA were: baseline, 0.3 (-11.7, 12.3) kg; 6M, 1.3 (-4.5, 7.1) kg; 12M, 0.9 (-5.4, 7.2) kg. Equivalent data for predictive equations against DXA were: equation 1: baseline, 15.1 (-9.5, 20.6) kg; 6M, 17.1 (-12.0, 22.2) kg; 12M, 17.5 (-13.0, 22.0) kg; equation 2: baseline, 12.6 (-7.3, 19.9) kg; 6M, 14.4 (-9.7, 19.1) kg; 12M, 14.8 (-10.7, 18.9) kg. Proportional bias (BIS: beta = -0.337, P<0.001; CAMA: beta = 20.294, P<0.001) was present at baseline but not at 6M or 12M. Clinicians should be cautious in using these field methods to predict FFM and SMM, particularly in the acute care setting. New predictive equations would be beneficial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available