4.5 Article

Behavior of steel bridge girders under fire conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 11-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.12.001

Keywords

Bridge fires; Steel girders; Fire resistance; Failure limit states; Web slenderness; Fire tests

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1068621]
  2. NSF
  3. University of Sulaimani in the form of a scholarship
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1068621] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1068252] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents results from experimental and numerical studies on the fire performance of typical steel girders used in bridges. As part of experimental studies three steel-concrete composite girders were tested under simultaneous loading and fire exposure. Test variables included: load level, web slenderness, and spacing of stiffeners. Results from fire tests indicate that typical steel girders can experience failure under standard fire conditions in about 30-35 min. The time to failure and mode of failure in fire exposed steel girders is highly influenced by web slenderness, spacing of stiffeners, and type of fire exposure. Steel bridge girders fail through flexural yielding when web slenderness is around 50; however failure mode changes to web shear buckling when web slenderness in girders exceed 100. Data from fire tests is utilized to validate a finite element based numerical model for tracing the response of steel bridge girders exposed to fire. Results from numerical analysis show that the proposed finite element model is capable of tracing the response of steel bridge girders under simultaneous loading and fire conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available