4.6 Article

Prognostic impact of monocyte count at presentation in mantle cell lymphoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 4, Pages 465-473

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12409

Keywords

mantle cell lymphoma; beta-2 microglobulin; absolute monocyte count; microenvironment; international prognostic index

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Cancer League (Krebsliga Schweiz) [KLS-01690-03-2005]
  2. Nelia and Amadeo Barletta Foundation (Lausanne, Switzerland)
  3. Ministry of Health, Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata (Rome, Italy)
  4. Novara-AIL Onlus (Novara, Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increased number of circulating monocytes at presentation has recently been associated with shorter survival in Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of the absolute monocyte count (AMC) at diagnosis in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). AMC at diagnosis was available in 97 MCL cases recorded in the databases of the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland in Bellinzona (Switzerland) and the Division of Haematology of the Amedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont in Novara (Italy). With a median follow up of 7years, the 5-year overall survival was 29% for patients with AMC >0.50x10(9)/l and 62% for patients with AMC <= 0.50x10(9)/l (P=0.008). Elevated AMC and beta-2 microglobulin at diagnosis remained independent outcome predictors at multivariate analysis, controlling for the MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), and have been used to build a simple prognostic scoring system. In this relatively small and heterogeneous series an increased AMC identified poor-risk patients. Our results suggest that AMC together with the beta-2 microglobulin level might provide an inexpensive way to stratify MCL patient risk as a complement to the MIPI, which was confirmed to be a very powerful prognostic tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available