4.4 Article

Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 63, Issue 617, Pages E813-E820

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X675395

Keywords

emergency medicine; general practice; primary health care; urgent care

Funding

  1. NHS National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  2. NIHR's Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Scheme
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre scheme
  4. Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality
  5. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2011-04-054] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  6. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2011-04-054] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Inappropriate attendances may account for up to 40% of presentations at accident and emergency (A&E) departments. There is considerable interest from health practitioners and policymakers in interventions to reduce this burden. Aim To review the evidence on primary care service interventions to reduce inappropriate A&E attendances. Design and setting Systematic review of UK and international primary care interventions. Method Studies published in English between 1 January 1986 and 23 August 2011 were identified from PubMed, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, the Cochrane Collaboration, and Health Technology Assessment databases. The outcome measures were A&E attendances, patient satisfaction, clinical outcome, and intervention cost. Two authors reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved results, with adjudication of disagreements conducted by the third. Studies were quality assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist system where applicable. Results In total, 9916 manuscripts were identified, of which 34 were reviewed. Telephone triage was the single best-evaluated intervention. This resulted in negligible impact on A&E attendance, but exhibited acceptable patient satisfaction and clinical safety; cost effectiveness was uncertain. The limited available evidence suggests that emergency nurse practitioners in community settings and community health centres may reduce A&E attendance. For all other interventions considered in this review (walk-in centres, minor injuries units, and out-of-hours general practice), the effects on A&E attendance, patient outcomes, and cost were inconclusive. Conclusion Studies showed a negligible effect on A&E attendance for all interventions; data on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness are limited. There is an urgent need to examine all aspects of primary care service interventions that aim to reduce inappropriate A&E attendance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available