4.6 Article

Drug survival is not significantly different between biologics in patients with psoriasis vulgaris: a single-centre database analysis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue 4, Pages 875-883

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13001

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundDrug survival depends on several factors such as dosing, effectiveness, quality-of-life improvement and safety, and could be seen as an overall marker for treatment success. Such data for biologics in psoriasis treatment are sparse. ObjectivesTo determine differences in drug survival between different biologics for psoriasis. MethodsDrug survival, dosing, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Skindex-29 at weeks 12 and 52, and adverse events of patients with psoriasis treated with a biologic registered in the local database of the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, were analysed. Patients were divided into those naive or non-naive for treatment episodes with biologics. ResultsDrug survival did not differ significantly for naive treatment episodes between the biologics (etanercept 85% to 64%, adalimumab 77% to 77%, infliximab 75% to 75% for year 1-4), or for non-naive treatment episodes (etanercept 86% to 42%, adalimumab 84% to 56%, infliximab 68% to 43% for year 1-4; ustekinumab 84% to 57% for year 1-3). The naive group showed better drug survival and PASI 75 response at week 12, although the difference was not significant. A similar improvement of mean PASI and mean Skindex-29 was observed at weeks 12 and 52 for all biologics for both groups, although no significant difference was seen between groups. Treatment termination was due mainly to nonresponse for all biologics. ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in drug survival, mean PASI or Skindex-29 response at weeks 12 or 52 between the biologics or between the naive and non-naive groups. Treatment termination was due mostly to nonresponse. Sequential treatment with the available biologics can be effective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available