4.7 Article

Tropomyosin-related receptor kinase B at the invasive front and tumour cell dedifferentiation in gastric cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages 2923-2934

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.228

Keywords

tropomyosin-related kinase B; gastric cancer; dedifferentiation; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (KAKENHI) [24591972, 25462051]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24591972, 25462051] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tropomyosin-related receptor kinase B (TrkB) promotes proliferation and invasion, relating to poor prognosis of various malignancies. We examined the role of TrkB at the invasive front of gastric cancer (GC) and its association with tumour cell dedifferentiation and tumour budding. Methods: Immunoreactive TrkB was evaluated at the tumour centre and margin using whole-tissue sections of 320 GC patients. Tumour cell dedifferentiation was defined as higher histologic grade at the tumour margin than the surface or tumour centre. Tumour budding was also scored on cytokeratin-stained sections. Results: Sixty-five patients (20%) showed higher TrkB expression at the invasive front (TrkB expression was higher at the tumour margin than tumour centre). It was significantly associated with several aggressive phenotypes in the full cohort (n=320). It showed a prognostic significance in test subgroup (n=98) and was identified as an independent prognostic factor (HR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.26-3.53) by multivariate analysis in validation subgroup (n=222). Twenty-one patients showed tumour cell dedifferentiation. In predominantly differentiated tumour, higher TrkB at the invasive front was significantly associated with tumour budding rather than tumour cell dedifferentiation. Conclusions: Assessment of immunoreactive TrkB at the invasive front by whole-tissue sections provides prognostic information for GC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available