4.7 Article

A prospective investigation of fish, meat and cooking-related carcinogens with endometrial cancer incidence

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages 756-760

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.252

Keywords

endometrial cancer; meat; fish; meat mutagens; epidemiology

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
  2. Florida Department of Health
  3. [T32 CA105666]
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801056B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There are limited prospective studies of fish and meat intakes with risk of endometrial cancer and findings are inconsistent. Methods: We studied associations between fish and meat intakes and endometrial cancer incidence in the large, prospective National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Intakes of meat mutagens 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx), 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx) and benzo(a) pyrene (BaP) were also calculated. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We observed no associations with endometrial cancer risk comparing the highest to lowest intake quintiles of red (HR=0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08), white (0.98, 0.83-1.17), processed meats (1.02, 0.86-1.21) and fish (1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.29). We also found no associations between meat mutagen intakes and endometrial cancer. Conclusion: Our findings do not support an association between meat or fish intakes or meat mutagens and endometrial cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available