4.7 Article

PSMB7 is associated with anthracycline resistance and is a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 361-368

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605478

Keywords

PSMB7; breast cancer; biomarker; doxorubicin; RNA interference; gene expression

Categories

Funding

  1. Bolyai fellowship
  2. ETT [029-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: To date individual markers have failed to correctly predict resistance against anticancer agents in breast cancer. We used gene expression patterns attributable to chemotherapy-resistant cells to detect potential new biomarkers related to anthracycline resistance. One of the genes, PSMB7, was selected for further functional studies and clinical validation. METHODS: We contrasted the expression profiles of four pairs of different human tumour cell lines and of their counterparts resistant to doxorubicin. Observed overexpression of PSMB7 in resistant cell lines was validated by immunohistochemistry. To examine its function in chemoresistance, we silenced the gene by RNA interference (RNAi) in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells, then cell vitality was measured after doxorubicin treatment. Microarray gene expression from GEO raw microarray samples with available progression-free survival data was downloaded, and expression of PSMB7 was used for grouping samples. RESULTS: After doxorubicin treatment, 79.8 +/- 13.3% of resistant cells survived. Silencing of PSMB7 in resistant cells decreased survival to 31.8 +/- 6.4% (P > 0.001). A similar effect was observed after paclitaxel treatment. In 1592 microarray samples, the patients with high PSMB7 expression had a significantly shorter survival than the patients with low expression (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that high PSMB7 expression is an unfavourable prognostic marker in breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 361-368. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605478 www.bjcancer.com Published online 15 December 2009 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available