4.7 Article

Reorganisation of Wnt-response pathways in colorectal tumorigenesis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages 1437-1442

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604327

Keywords

colorectal carcinogenesis; Wnt signalling; NKD1; beta-catenin; independent signalling

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In most colorectal tumours, APC mutation stabilises beta-catenin and mimics elements of Wnt growth factor signalling, but the high frequency of epigenetic loss of Wnt antagonists indicates an additional role for ligand-mediated Wnt signalling. Here, we have investigated the expression of key components of beta-catenin-independent Wnt response pathways to determine whether their profiles change during the transition from normal mucosa to colorectal adenomas. Transcription of the Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway determinant NKD1 (naked cuticle homologue 1) was induced in adenomas by a median 135-fold and in cancers by 7.4-fold. While some Frizzleds (FZDs) were downregulated in adenomas, the Wnt/Ca2+ receptors FZD3 and FZD6 were induced by a median factor of 6.5 and 4.6, respectively. Naked cuticle homologue 1, FZD3 and FZD6 expression were coordinated in pre-malignant disease, but this relationship was lost in invasive cancers, where FZD induction was seen less frequently. Naked cuticle homologue 1 expression was associated with nuclear localisation of phospho-c-Jun in adenomas. In cultured cells, NKD1 transcription was induced by lithium chloride but FZD3 expression required Wnt growth factor treatment. These data show that Wnt responses are consistently directed towards both beta-catenin-independent routes in early colorectal tumorigenesis and elements of this are retained in more advanced cancers. These beta-catenin-independent Wnt signalling pathways may provide novel targets for chemoprevention of early colorectal tumours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available