4.6 Article

Failed tracheal intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: 2 yr national casecontrol study in the UK

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 74-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes320

Keywords

airway complications; failed tracheal intubation; anaesthesia obstetrics; incidence; laryngeal masks; UK Obstetric Surveillance System, UKOSS

Categories

Funding

  1. UKCRN Portfolio study 7563 Obstetric Anaesthetists Association
  2. NIHR
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PDA/02/06/044] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are few national figures on the incidence of failed tracheal intubation during general anaesthesia in obstetrics. Recent small studies have quoted a rate of one in 250 general anaesthetics (GAs). The aim of this UK national study was to estimate this rate and identify factors that may be predictors. Using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) of data collection, a survey was conducted between April 2008 and March 2010. Incidence and associated risk factors were recorded in consultant-led UK delivery suites. Units reported the details of any failed intubation (index case) and the two preceding GA cases (controls). Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, significance P0.05 (two-sided). We received 57 completed reports (100 response). The incidence using a unit-based estimation approach was one in 224 (95 confidence interval 179281). Univariate analyses showed the index cases to be significantly older, heavier, with higher BMI, with Mallampati score recorded and score 1. Multivariate analyses showed that age, BMI, and a recorded Mallampati score were significant independent predictors of failed tracheal intubation. The classical laryngeal mask airway was the most commonly used rescue airway (39/57 cases). There was one emergency surgical airway but no deaths or hypoxic brain injuries. Gastric aspiration occurred in four (8) index cases. Index cases were more likely to have maternal morbidities (P0.026) and many babies in both groups were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: 21 (37) vs 29 (27) (NS). Three babies diedall in the control group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available