4.4 Article

Challenges of carbon labelling of food products: a consumer research perspective

Journal

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
Volume 113, Issue 8-9, Pages 982-996

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/00070701111153742

Keywords

Labelling; Consumer behaviour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to critically reflect on the effects that carbon labelling of food products will have on consumer purchasing behaviour and on reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Design/methodology/approach - The paper summarises the findings from research on organic food-purchasing behaviour and discusses how this can be applied to the new field of carbon labelling of food. Two consumer behaviour studies specifically examining carbon labelling are also reviewed. Findings - Although consumers have positive attitudes to preserving the environment, sales of organic products are low for several reasons: perceived high price, strong habits governing food purchases, perceived low availability, lack of marketing and information, lack of trust in the labelling system, and low perceived customer effectiveness. All these obstacles apply to the purchase of carbon labelled products and several are even greater for carbon-labelled products, since these do not bring any personal benefits to the consumer, unlike the perceived case for organic products. Practical implications - A carbon labelling scheme must be introduced carefully to avoid confusing the consumer. The goal of the carbon labelling system must be defined, and the label and labelling system designed and managed to meet that goal. Originality/value - Lessons learned from the abundant research on purchasing behaviour regarding organic food are applied to the new field of carbon labelling for the first time. Fields in need of further research for the successful introduction of carbon labelling schemes are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available