4.5 Article

Gene regulatory elements of the cardiac conduction system

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 28-38

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elt031

Keywords

cardiac conduction system; arrhythmias; enhancers; genetic variation; epigenetic variation; TBX transcription factors

Funding

  1. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coordinated contraction of the heart relies on the generation and conduction of the electrical impulse. Aberrations of the function of the cardiac conduction system have been associated with various arrhythmogenic disorders and increased risk of sudden cardiac death. The genetics underlying conduction system function have been investigated using functional studies and genome-wide association studies. Both methods point towards the involvement of ion channel genes and the transcription factors that govern their activity. A large fraction of disease- and trait-associated sequence variants lie within non-coding sequences, enriched with epigenetic marks indicative of regulatory DNA. Although sequence conservation as a result of functional constraint has been a useful property to identify transcriptional enhancers, this identification process has been advanced through the development of techniques such as ChIP-seq and chromatin conformation capture technologies. The role of variation in gene regulatory elements in the cardiac conduction system has recently been demonstrated by studies on enhancers of SCN5A/SCN10A and TBX5. In both studies, a region harbouring a functionally implicated single-nucleotide polymorphism was shown to drive reproducible cardiac expression in a reporter gene assay. Furthermore, the risk variant of the allele abrogated enhancer function in both cases. Functional studies on regulatory DNA will likely receive a boost through recent developments in genome modification technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available