4.5 Article

Induction of the small heat shock protein αB-crystallin by genotoxic stress is mediated by p53 and p73

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 122, Issue 1, Pages 159-168

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0542-7

Keywords

p53; p73; Delta Np73 alpha; TAp73; alpha B-crystallin; DNA damage

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA097198, R21CA125181, T32CA09560]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The small heat shock protein alpha B-crystallin is a molecular chaperone that is induced by stress and protects cells by inhibiting protein aggregation and apoptosis. To identify novel transcriptional regulators of the alpha B-crystallin gene, we examined the alpha B-crystallin promoter for conserved transcription factor DNA-binding elements and identified a putative response element for the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Ectopic expression of wild-type p53 induced alpha B-crystallin mRNA and protein with delayed kinetics compared to p21. Additionally, the induction of alpha B-crystallin by genotoxic stress was inhibited by siRNAs targeting p53. Although the p53-dependent transactivation of an alpha B-crystallin promoter luciferase reporter required the putative p53RE, chromatin immunoprecipitation failed to detect p53 binding to the alpha B-crystallin promoter. These results suggested an indirect mechanism of transactivation involving p53 family members p63 or p73. Delta Np73 was dramatically induced by p53 in a TAp73-dependent manner, and silencing p73 suppressed the transcriptional activation of alpha B-crystallin by p53. Moreover, ectopic expression of Delta Np73 alpha (but not other p73 isoforms) increased alpha B-crystallin mRNA levels in the absence of p53. Collectively, our results link the molecular chaperone alpha B-crystallin to the cellular genotoxic stress response via a novel mechanism of transcriptional regulation by p53 and p73.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available