4.5 Article

Detection of human mammaglobin mRNA in serial peripheral blood samples from patients with non-metastatic breast cancer is not predictive of disease recurrence

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 223-232

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0002-9

Keywords

Breast cancer; Mammaglobin; Minimal residual disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PRAXIS/P/SAU/14037/1998]
  2. Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Human mammaglobin (hMAM) mRNA is a sensitive and specific marker of breast cancer cells. We evaluated if hMAM mRNA detection in serial peripheral blood samples from non-metastatic breast cancer patients predicts for disease recurrence. Methods Patients scheduled for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Serial blood samples were collected up to 5 years, the first before (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy. hMAM gene expression was analysed by RT-PCR. Specificity was evaluated in blood samples from healthy volunteers. A total of 321 patients were included. Results The incidence of pre-chemotherapy hMAM-positive samples was similar in patients who latter experienced cancer recurrence (22.4%) and those who remained disease-free (17.9%; P = 0.46). Similarly, the mean number of positive follow-up samples was similar in both groups (0.15 +/- 0.22 and 0.13 +/- 013; P = 0.29). Furthermore, there was no difference in disease-free (P = 0.63) or overall survival (P = 0.57) in patients with and without positive baseline samples or between patients whose follow-up samples were always hMAM negative and those with at least one positive sample. Multivariate survival analysis confirmed that hMAM mRNA detection before or after (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy was not predictive of recurrence. Discussion There is no evidence that hMAM mRNA detection at diagnosis or during follow-up predicts for breast cancer recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available