4.5 Article

Low grade Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS): How best to describe it?

Journal

BREAST
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 693-696

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.06.013

Keywords

Low grade DCIS; Breast screening; Clinicians' views

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [15958] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [11/36/16] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Department of Health [11/36/16] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In the absence of definitive data about the natural history of DCIS the appropriateness of describing DCIS as cancer is controversial. Methods: We conducted a survey amongst British Breast Group (BBG) members, to determine which descriptions of DCIS were deemed most accurate and appropriate. Results: 54/73 (74%) attendees completed the survey: A majority (34/54; 63%) said they would be comfortable using the description that explained DCIS as abnormal cells in the milk ducts that had not spread into other breast tissue and which did not need urgent treatment as if it was breast cancer and this description was overall the most preferred (24/54; 44%). Conclusions: Little consensus exists regarding how best to explain low grade DCIS to patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available