4.5 Article

An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast Q

Journal

BREAST
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 158-161

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.001

Keywords

Patient reported outcomes; Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Breast-Q

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Breast Q questionnaire measures patient's perceptions following breast reconstruction using quality of life and satisfaction. This study assessed patient reported outcomes following mastectomy and reconstruction utilizing Breast Q Methods: All consecutive Letterkenny Hospital patients undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction between August 2008 and February 2011 were invited to complete Breast Q evaluation of their care. Collected data included: age; presenting complaint, height, weight; type of operation. RUMM 2020 program evaluated satisfaction where 0 is very dissatisfied to 100 very satisfied. Results: 30/33 (91%) patients completed Breast Q; mean age 43 +/- 11 (range 29-64); mean BMI 27.3 +/- 5 (range 21.7-43.1). 27 patients were symptomatic, and 3 were image detected. 23 had a latissimus dorsi reconstruction, 11 of these with implant augmentation, 5 had a DIEP and 2 implant only reconstruction. The mean satisfaction score of 79.7 indicating good to excellent results. Post reconstructive outcomes were not statistically different from pre-operative perceptions in key areas such as satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial and sexual well-being. Conclusion: This study identified outcomes as good as if not superior to international averages with preservation of satisfaction with breast and psychosocial well-being. Breast Q could help form a template for national benchmarks in patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available