4.5 Article

Somatosensory organ topography across the star of the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 524, Issue 5, Pages 917-929

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23943

Keywords

sensory system; touch; receptor topography; RRID:nif-0000-30467; RRID:rid_000042

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS084706]
  2. National Science Foundation [1456472]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1456472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying somatosensory receptor distribution in glabrous skin is usually difficult because of the diversity of skin receptor subtypes and their location within the dermis and epidermis. However, the glabrous noses of moles are an exception. In most species of moles, the skin on the nose is covered with domed mechanosensory units known as an Eimer's organs. Eimer's organs contain a stereotyped array of different mechanosensory neurons, meaning that the distribution of mechanosensitive nerve endings can be inferred by visual inspection of the skin surface. Here we detail the distribution of Eimer's organs on the highly derived somatosensory star on the rostrum of the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata). The star consists of 22 fleshy appendages, or rays, that are covered in Eimer's organs. We find that the density of Eimer's organs increases from proximal to distal locations along the length of the star's rays with a ratio of 1:2.3:3.1 from the surface nearest to the nostril, to the middle part of ray, to the ray tip, respectively. This ratio is comparable to the increase in receptor unit density reported for the human hand, from the palm, to the middle of the digits, to the distal fingertips. We also note that the tactile fovea of the star-nosed mole, located on the medial ventral ray, does not have increased sensory organ density, and we describe these findings in comparison with other sensory fovea. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:917-929, 2016. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available