3.9 Article

Isotopic fractionation and trophic position of zooplankton species in the Upper Parana River floodplain

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 71-76

Publisher

INT INST ECOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842011000100011

Keywords

stable isotopes; trophic level; zooplankton; food chain

Categories

Funding

  1. Capes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the isotopic fractionation and trophic position of three zooplankton species (Notodiaptomus amazonicus, Moina minuta and Bosmina hagmanni) in the Upper Parana River floodplain. We predict that phytoplankton is the main food resource used by these species. Three zooplankton samples and three phytoplankton samples were taken from each sampling site, with three to four samples collected for each species. The number of individuals for samples varied according to the body size: from 100 to 130 individuals for Notodiaptomus amazonicus; 150 to 200 for Moina minuta; and from 250 to 300 for Bosmina hagmanni. The isotopic values for delta C-13 and delta N-15 were determined using mass spectrophotometer. The isotopic fractionation of C-13 was performed according to the relationship Delta = delta C-13(zooplankton) - delta C-13(phytoplankton). To determine the possible trophic position of these species, we used the expression TL =(delta N-15(zooplankton) - delta N-15(phytoplankton))/Delta+ 1. The species showed high variation in isotopic fractionation and in trophic position in the different environments. We verified that the species use other food resources in addition to phytoplankton. The elucidation and understanding of the trophic position of the organisms based on stable isotopic analysis offers complementary information to traditional techniques. This analysis helps explain the flow of matter and energy in the food chain of floodplain aquatic environments as well as trace the trophic relationships involved in the ecological roles and strategies of distinct species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available