4.5 Article

Association between monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A gene variants and schizophrenia in a Chinese population

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1287, Issue -, Pages 67-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.072

Keywords

Schizophrenia; MAO; Polymorphism; Haplotype; Case control; Association

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical research Institute [03T-459, 05T-726]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs
  3. Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC)
  4. United States National Institute of Health [K05-DA04S4, P50-DA18827, U01-MH79639]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) A is a critical enzyme in the catabolism of dopamine. Dysfunction of dopaminergic systems has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, suggesting that MAOA gene variation might be associated with the disorder. MAOA gene variation was compared between 234 Chinese schizophrenic patients and 121 healthy controls. Three polymorphic markers of the MAOA gene were analyzed using PCR techniques: two MAOA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP), -941G/T and -1460C/T, and the variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) in the promoter region. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analyses were performed with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. in single marker analyses the 941T allele was significantly associated with schizophrenia in men (p=0.01). Haplotype analyses revealed a significant overall difference (p=0.03) between schizophrenia and control men, with higher frequencies of haplotypes containing the major allele (T) of -941T/G and the short allele (3 repeats) of the VNTR polymorphisms. No significant associations were detected for females using single markers or haplotypes. These findings suggest that genetic variants in MAOA may play a role in susceptibility to schizophrenia in Chinese men. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available