4.5 Article

Characterization of clozapine-induced changes in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal-mPFC pathway of anesthetized rats

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1195, Issue -, Pages 50-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.010

Keywords

synaptic plasticity; clozapine; medial prefrontal cortex; dopamine D-1 receptors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synaptic plasticity expressed as long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampal-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) pathway is considered to be involved in cognitive function and learning and memory processes, but its synaptic mechanism remains unknown. The present study characterized LTP in the mPFC using the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, with a focus on dopaminergic modulation. The magnitude of LTP was facilitated by pretreatment with clozapine (20 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p.). Clozapine-induced LTP augmentation was blocked by the dopamine D, receptor antagonist SCH-23390 (10 mu g/rat, i.c.v.), but not by the D-2 receptor antagonist remoxipride (10 mu g/rat, i.c.v.) or the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (20 mu g/rat, i.c.v.). SCH-23390 (10 gg/rat, i.c.v.) by itself did not affect LTP induction. The D-1 receptor agonist SKF-38393 (10 mu g/kg, i.c.v.) facilitated LTP, mimicking the clozapine-induced response. Furthermore, in vivo microdialysis showed that transient increases in mPFC dopamine levels induced by tetanic stimulation sustained facilitation following clozapine administration (20 mg/kg, i.p.). These results demonstrate the importance of the D, receptor as a mediator of clozapine-induced LTP augmentation through enhanced dopaminergic activity. Augmentation of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal-mPFC pathway via D, receptors appears to be responsible for the therapeutic effects of clozapine. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available