4.6 Article

Commonly circulating human coronaviruses do not have a significant role in the etiology of gastrointestinal infections in hospitalized children

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 114-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.10.017

Keywords

Acute gastroenteritis; Children; Human coronavirus; RT-PCR; Stool

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Tampere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Human coronaviruses (HCoVs) OC43, 229E, NL63 and HKU1 are common causes of respiratory infections. Over the years, it has been proposed that HCoVs play a possible role in gastrointestinal infections. Objectives: To assess the role of HCoVs in acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in children. Study design: Study was conducted at Tampere University Hospital over 2 years. Both stool and nasal swab samples were collected from 172 children with AGE, 545 with acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI) and 238 with symptoms of both. The samples were tested for HCoVs by RT-PCR. Results: HCoVs were detected in 52 (5.4%) children: in 6.4% of those with AGE, 4.4% with ARTI and 7.1% with symptoms of both. HCoVs OC43, HKU1, 229E and NL63 were encountered in 13, 11, 13 and 15 cases, respectively. HCoVs were detected simultaneously in stool and nasal swab samples in 17 children, in nasal swabs alone in 33 children, and in the stools alone in two children. HCoVs were present in the stools of eight (4.7%) of the 172 children with AGE; in six of these cases, the nasal swab sample was also positive for the respective HCoV. Additionally, in six of the eight cases, the stool sample contained either rotavirus or calicivirus. Conclusions: HCoVs can be detected in the stools of children with AGE, but usually together with well-known gastroenteritis viruses, and concomitantly in the respiratory tract. It appears that commonly circulating HCoVs do not have a significant role in the AGE of children admitted to hospital. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available