4.4 Article

Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Dynamics with Constant Bowen Ratio

Journal

BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages 227-240

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-009-9400-8

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer; Bowen ratio; Evaporation; Mixed layer; Slab model

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [EAR-0628432, EAR-0635787]
  2. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Temple, TX
  3. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the observation that the diurnal evolution of sensible and latent heat fluxes tends to maintain a constant Bowen ratio, we derive approximate solutions of the ordinary differential equations of a simplified atmospheric boundary-layer (ABL) model. Neglecting the early morning transition, the potential temperature and specific humidity of the mixed layer are found to be linearly related to the ABL height. Similar behaviour is followed by the inversion strengths of temperature and humidity at the top of the ABL. The potential temperature of the mixed layer depends on the entrainment parameter and the free-atmosphere temperature lapse rate, while the specific humidity also depends on the free-atmosphere humidity lapse rate and the Bowen ratio. The temporal dynamics appear only implicitly in the evolution of the height of the boundary layer, which in turn depends on the time-integrated surface sensible heat flux. Studying the limiting behaviour of the Bowen ratio for very low and very large values of net available energy, we also show how the tendency to maintain constant Bowen ratio during midday hours stems from its relative insensitivity to the atmospheric conditions for large values of net available energy. The analytical expression for the diurnal evolution of the ABL obtained with constant Bowen ratio is simple and provides a benchmark for the results of more complex models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available