4.1 Article

Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra

Journal

BOTANY
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 315-323

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/B08-125

Keywords

dioecy; module; photosynthetic rate; reproductive allocation; reproductive size; willow

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [12460064]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [12460064] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In dioecious plants, females often incur greater reproductive costs than males, owing to the production of seed. This has led to evolution of cost-compensatory mechanisms in females. In trees, however, reproductive cost and compensatory mechanisms are not always detectable, probably because costs and compensation traits change with time, plant size, and modular level (i.e., individual shoots and whole plants). Herein we investigated sex-specific reproductive allocation, growth, and carbon acquisition mechanisms at different hierarchical levels in a dioecious tree, Salix integra Thunb. At both shoot and whole-plant levels, females invested more resources into reproduction than males, but without an associated reduction in vegetative growth, suggesting compensatory mechanisms in females. Females had greater biomass allocation to photosynthetic organs and higher photosynthetic rates than males. Although photosynthetic rates decreased with age, higher shoot turnover in females maintained higher productivity by consistently locating new leaves in favourable light. Females had larger areas of leafy bracts beneath peduncles, suggesting a reduction in the translocation distance of the assimilation to mature seeds. Females meet greater reproductive costs not by reducing growth, but by increasing the carbon uptake ability of different modular units in well-illuminated microenvironments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available