4.4 Article

Comparative floral development in Lardizabalaceae (Ranunculales)

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 166, Issue 2, Pages 171-184

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01144.x

Keywords

Akebia trifoliata; Decaisnea insignis; Holboellia grandiflora; petals; phyllotaxis; staminodes

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry of Ministry of Education of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lardizabalaceae, one of seven families of Ranunculales, represent a monophyletic group. The family has functionally unisexual flowers with the organs in trimerous whorls, petaloid sepals and sometimes nectariferous petals. Among Ranunculales, Lardizabalaceae share several floral characters and climbing habit with Menispermaceae, but molecular analyses indicate that Circaeasteraceae and Lardizabalaceae form a strongly supported clade. Morphological and ontogenetic studies of flowers have proved to be a good complement to molecular data in clarifying relationships. Floral organogenesis has been studied in very few species of the family. This study investigates the comparative floral development of three species from three genera (Decaisnea, Akebia and Holboellia) of Lardizabalaceae using scanning electron microscopy. Flowers have a whorled phyllotaxis. Within each whorl, the organs are initiated either simultaneously or in a rapid spiral sequence. In Akebia, six sepals are initiated, but one to three sepals of the second whorl do not further develop. The presence of three sepals in Akebia is thus a developmentally secondary simplification. The petals (if present) are retarded in early developmental stages; stamens and petals are different in shape from the beginning of development. The retarded petals may not be derived from staminodes in Lardizabalaceae. (C) 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 171-184.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available