4.5 Article

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donation-standardized assessment of donor outcome data: A consensus statement from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT)

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 220-225

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.119

Keywords

donor outcome; global donor follow-up; serious adverse reactions; minimal data set; WBMT

Funding

  1. Swiss Blood Stem Cells (SBSC)
  2. Swiss National Research Foundation [406340-128111]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [406340_128111] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic SCTs performed globally each year continues to increase, paralleled by an increased demand for donors of therapeutic cells. Donor characteristics and collection procedures have undergone major changes during recent decades, and further changes are foreseen. Information on short- and long-term donor outcomes is of crucial importance to ensure maximal donor safety and availability. Current data, predominantly from unrelated donors, give reliable information on the frequent early events associated with donation-most of them of mild-to-moderate intensity. Information on the type and relative risk of serious adverse reactions is more limited. Moreover, only few data exist on long-term donor outcome. On the basis of this need, recommendations for a minimum data set for prospective donor follow-up were developed in a workshop with the participation of an international group of investigators actively involved in allogeneic stem cell donation under the auspices of and approved by the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Establishment of a standardized global follow-up for both, related and unrelated, donors will enable monitoring of the short- and long-term safety profiles of hematopoietic cell donation and form a solid basis for future donor selection and counseling. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2013) 48, 220-225; doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.119; published online 9 July 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available