4.5 Article

Sequential recovery of NK cell receptor repertoire after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 1022-1030

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.384

Keywords

KIR; NKG2A; NK cell; allo-HSCT; steroids

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [2 PO5B 155 28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alloreactivity of natural killer (NK) cells contributes to the GVL reaction after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). However, various procedure-related factors may affect NK cell maturation and their ability to recognize and kill leukemic cells. In this study, we prospectively evaluated expression of NK cell inhibitory receptors in 83 adults treated with myeloablative, killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR)-ligand-matched allo-HSCT. NK cell maturation was evaluated by comparing the phenotypic patterns after allo-HSCT with the donor ones. The frequencies of KIR3DL1 were comparable to the donor ones on day +28, while they decreased significantly starting from day +100. The expression of KIR2DL2/3 was significantly lower in patients compared with donors up to day +100. The expression of KIR2DL1, despite continues growth, remained significantly decreased for 1 year after allo-HSCT. NKG2A was over-expressed up to day +180. Within 1 year after allo-HSCT, the NK cell phenotypic pattern tended to recapitulate the donor type. The process was disturbed by the use of steroids with signi. cant differences observed on days +56 (P = 0.01) and +100 (P = 0.04). Up to day +100, reconstitution of NK cell receptor repertoire correlated with the absolute numbers of circulating CD3(+), CD3(+)CD4(+) and CD3(+)CD8(+) cells. Our observations should be taken into account when trying to predict potential benefit from NK cell alloreactivity. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2010) 45, 1022-1030; doi:10.1038/bmt.2009.384; published online 1 February 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available