Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk
Authors
Keywords
Faecal Occult Blood Test, Private Health Insurance, Colonoscopy Screening, Faecal Occult Blood Test Screening, National Bowel Cancer Screen Program
Journal
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-03-21
DOI
10.1186/1471-2458-13-248
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Factors associated with consultation behaviour for primary symptoms potentially indicating colorectal cancer: A cross-sectional study on response to symptoms
- (2012) Ryan J Courtney et al. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Current state of medical-advice-seeking behaviour for symptoms of colorectal cancer: determinants of failure and delay in medical consultation
- (2012) R. J. Courtney et al. Colorectal Disease
- Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia
- (2010) Paul R. Ward et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Knowledge, perception and practices of colorectal cancer screening in an ethnically diverse population
- (2010) Jenn Hian Koo et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Cohort Profile: The Hunter Community Study
- (2010) M. McEvoy et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Endorsement by the Primary Care Practitioner Consistently Improves Participation in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Longitudinal Analysis
- (2010) I T Zajac et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies
- (2010) Sara Javanparast et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use in the Medicare Population, 1998–2005
- (2009) Anna P. Schenck et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England
- (2009) C von Wagner et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons
- (2009) Idris Guessous et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Validity of Four Self-reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in a General Population: Differences over Time and by Intervention Assignment
- (2008) R. M. Jones et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Validation of Self-Reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Behavior from a Mixed-Mode Survey of Veterans
- (2008) M. R. Partin et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Accuracy of Self-Reported Cancer-Screening Histories: A Meta-analysis
- (2008) G. H. Rauscher et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Population characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and Up Study cohort
- (2008) Marianne F Weber et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review
- (2007) G. REES et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started