4.5 Article

Risk stratification using data from electronic medical records better predicts suicide risks than clinician assessments

Journal

BMC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-76

Keywords

Suicide risk; Electronic medical record; Predictive models

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. Cooperative Research Centre
  3. Simons Autism Foundation
  4. Cancer Council of Victoria
  5. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  6. MBF
  7. NHMRC
  8. Beyond Blue
  9. Rotary Health
  10. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  11. Bristol Myers Squibb
  12. Eli Lilly
  13. Glaxo SmithKline
  14. Meat and Livestock Board
  15. Organon
  16. Novartis
  17. Mayne Pharma
  18. Servier
  19. Woolworths

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To date, our ability to accurately identify patients at high risk from suicidal behaviour, and thus to target interventions, has been fairly limited. This study examined a large pool of factors that are potentially associated with suicide risk from the comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) and to derive a predictive model for 1-6 month risk. Methods: 7,399 patients undergoing suicide risk assessment were followed up for 180 days. The dataset was divided into a derivation and validation cohorts of 4,911 and 2,488 respectively. Clinicians used an 18-point checklist of known risk factors to divide patients into low, medium, or high risk. Their predictive ability was compared with a risk stratification model derived from the EMR data. The model was based on the continuation-ratio ordinal regression method coupled with lasso (which stands for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator). Results: In the year prior to suicide assessment, 66.8% of patients attended the emergency department (ED) and 41.8% had at least one hospital admission. Administrative and demographic data, along with information on prior self-harm episodes, as well as mental and physical health diagnoses were predictive of high-risk suicidal behaviour. Clinicians using the 18-point checklist were relatively poor in predicting patients at high-risk in 3 months (AUC 0.58, 95% CIs: 0.50 - 0.66). The model derived EMR was superior (AUC 0.79, 95% CIs: 0.72 - 0.84). At specificity of 0.72 (95% CIs: 0.70-0.73) the EMR model had sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CIs: 0.56-0.83). Conclusion: Predictive models applied to data from the EMR could improve risk stratification of patients presenting with potential suicidal behaviour. The predictive factors include known risks for suicide, but also other information relating to general health and health service utilisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available