4.7 Article

Identification of a G2-like transcription factor, OsPHL3, functions as a negative regulator of flowering in rice by co-expression and reverse genetic analysis

Journal

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1382-6

Keywords

Co-expression; Flowering time; OsPHL3; MYB-CC transcription factor; G2-like; Rice

Categories

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA08020102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000561, 31771473]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Science [2017140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Flowering time is a key trait for regional adaption and seed production in rice (Oryza sativa L). Forward and reverse genetic studies have characterized a number of flowering-time genes. However, co-expression analysis has not been used to identify the flowering-time genes. Results: We predicted a G2-like family transcription factor, OsPHL3, by co-expression networks analysis with photoperiodic flowering pathway genes. OsPHL3 contains a MYB-CC domain, and was localized in the nucleus with transcriptional activation potential. OsPHL3 was mainly expressed in the leaves and exhibited a circadian rhythmic expression pattern. Rice lines overexpressing OsPHL3 showed a delayed flowering time in the genetic background of TP309 under both long-day (Beijing) and short-day (Hainan) conditions. By contrast, the knockout rice lines of OsPHL3 by CRISPFVCas9 technology promoted flowering time regardless of genetic backgrounds (i.e. Nipponbare and TP309) or day length. Further analysis indicated that OsPHL3 delayed flowering time by down-regulating the expression of Hd3a and RFT1 through promoting Hd1 under long-day conditions (LDs), or suppressing Ehd1/Hd1 under short-day conditions (SDs). Conclusions: Our results suggested that co-expression analysis is a useful strategy for identifying novel flowering time genes in rice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available