4.4 Article

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation

Journal

BMC NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-55

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  2. Accorda
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. Bayer Pharma AG
  5. Merck Serono
  6. Sanofi Aventis
  7. Teva
  8. Novartis
  9. Bayer Pharma
  10. ARSEP
  11. Roche
  12. Biogen
  13. Teva Neuroscience
  14. Bayer Healthcare
  15. Bayer AG Switzerland
  16. Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society
  17. Vertex
  18. Serono Symposia
  19. Merck-Serono
  20. Bayer AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An international expert consensus committee recently recommended a brief battery of tests for cognitive evaluation in multiple sclerosis. The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) battery includes tests of mental processing speed and memory. Recognizing that resources for validation will vary internationally, the committee identified validation priorities, to facilitate international acceptance of BICAMS. Practical matters pertaining to implementation across different languages and countries were discussed. Five steps to achieve optimal psychometric validation were proposed. In Step 1, test stimuli should be standardized for the target culture or language under consideration. In Step 2, examiner instructions must be standardized and translated, including all information from manuals necessary for administration and interpretation. In Step 3, samples of at least 65 healthy persons should be studied for normalization, matched to patients on demographics such as age, gender and education. The objective of Step 4 is test-retest reliability, which can be investigated in a small sample of MS and/or healthy volunteers over 1-3 weeks. Finally, in Step 5, criterion validity should be established by comparing MS and healthy controls. At this time, preliminary studies are underway in a number of countries as we move forward with this international assessment tool for cognition in MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available