4.5 Article

Characterization of the age-dependent intervertebral disc changes in rabbit by correlation between MRI, histology and gene expression

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-147

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Societe Francaise de Rhumatologie
  2. Fondation de l'Avenir pour la Recherche Medicale Appliquee [ET8-491, ET9-541]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche AAP TeCSAN
  4. Agence de la Biomedecine
  5. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  6. region des Pays de la Loire
  7. University Hospital of Nantes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The present study was conducted to address whether the intervertebral disc of rabbit could be considered (i) as a valuable model to provide new insights into the tissue and cellular changes of Nucleus pulposus aging and (ii) as an appropriate tool to investigate the efficacy of Nucleus pulposus cell-based biotherapies. Methods: Lumbar intervertebral disc from rabbits with increasing ages (1, 6 and 30 month-old) were compared by MRI and histological observation using Pfirrmann's grading and Boos' scoring respectively. The expression of transcripts (COL2A1, AGC1, COL1A1, MMP13, BMP2, MGP and p21) in Nucleus pulposus cells were analysed by quantitative real-time PCR. Results: MRI analysis indicated an early age-dependent increase in the Pfirrmann's grading. Histological Boos' scoring was also increased. The analysis of transcript expression levels showed that COL2A1 and AGC1 were down-regulated as a function of age. Conversely, COL1A1, MMP-13, BMP-2, MGP and p21 were significantly up-regulated in the Nucleus pulposus cells of aged rabbit intervertebral disc. Conclusions: Our study describes the consistency of the rabbit as a model of intervertebral disc changes as a function of age by correlating tissue alteration with cellular modification measured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available