Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis

Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies

(2011) Meera Viswanathan et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma

(2011) Lisa Hartling et al.   PLoS One

Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain

(2011) Nadine Graham et al.   SPINE

A Quality-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

(2010) Andrew J. Gerber et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY

Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed

(2010) Agnes Dechartres et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research

(2010) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.   JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products

(2009) Tannis Jurgens et al.   BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy

(2009) James H. Kocsis et al.   COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

(2008) Lesley Wood et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal