4.4 Article

Impacts of genetic correlation on the independent evolution of body mass and skeletal size in mammals

Journal

BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-014-0258-0

Keywords

Evolvability; Genetic lines of least resistance; Limb length; Body mass; Allometry; Artificial selection; Rodent locomotion

Funding

  1. University of Calgary Killam Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [4181932, 238992]
  3. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Calgary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mammals show a predictable scaling relationship between limb bone size and body mass. This relationship has a genetic basis which likely evolved via natural selection, but it is unclear how much the genetic correlation between these traits in turn impacts their capacity to evolve independently. We selectively bred laboratory mice for increases in tibia length independent of body mass, to test the hypothesis that a genetic correlation with body mass constrains evolutionary change in tibia length. Results: Over 14 generations, we produced mean tibia length increases of 9-13%, while mean body mass was unchanged, in selectively bred mice and random-bred controls. Using evolutionary scenarios with different selection and quantitative genetic parameters, we also found that this genetic correlation impedes the rate of evolutionary change in both traits, slowing increases in tibia length while preventing decreases in body mass, despite the latter's negative effect on fitness. Conclusions: Overall, results from this ongoing selection experiment suggest that parallel evolution of relatively longer hind limbs among rodents, for example in the context of strong competition for resources and niche partitioning in heterogeneous environments, may have occurred very rapidly on geological timescales, in spite of a moderately strong genetic correlation between tibia length and body mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available