4.4 Article

Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly

Journal

BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-235

Keywords

Artificial selection; Bicyclus anynana; Constraint; Genetic adaptation; Genotype by environment interaction; Phenotypic plasticity; Temperature stress resistance

Funding

  1. University of Greifswald
  2. Landesgraduiertenforderung of Mecklenburg Western Pomerania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Organisms may respond to environmental change by means of genetic adaptation, phenotypic plasticity or both, which may result in genotype-environment interactions (G x E) if genotypes differ in their phenotypic response. We here specifically target the latter source of variation (i.e. G x E) by comparing plastic responses among lines of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana that had been selected for increased cold tolerance and according controls. Our main aim here was to test the hypothesis that directional selection on cold tolerance will interfere with plastic capacities. Results: Plastic responses to temperature and feeding treatments were strong, with e. g. higher compared to lower temperatures reducing cold tolerance, longevity, pupal mass, and development time. We report a number of statistically significant genotype-environment interactions (i.e. interactions between selection regime and environmental variables), but most of these were not consistent across treatment groups. We found some evidence though for larger plastic responses to different rearing temperatures in the selection compared to the control lines, while plastic responses to different adult temperatures and feeding treatments were overall very similar across selection regimes. Conclusion: Our results indicate that plastic capacities are not always constrained by directional selection (on cold tolerance) and therefore genetic changes in trait means, but may operate independently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available