4.4 Article

Comorbidity profiles and inpatient outcomes during hospitalization for heart failure: an analysis of the US Nationwide inpatient sample

Journal

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-73

Keywords

Heart failure; Comorbidity; Outcomes; Inpatient

Funding

  1. Office of Research on Women's Health
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through the Oregon Building Interdisciplinary Research on Women's Health program [HD043488-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Treatment of heart failure (HF) is particularly complex in the presence of comorbidities. We sought to identify and associate comorbidity profiles with inpatient outcomes during HF hospitalizations. Methods: Latent mixture modeling was used to identify common profiles of comorbidities during adult hospitalizations for HF from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (n = 192,327). Results: Most discharges were characterized by common comorbidities. A lifestyle profile was characterized by a high prevalence of uncomplicated diabetes, hypertension, chronic pulmonary disorders and obesity. A renal profile had the highest prevalence of renal disease, complicated diabetes, and fluid and electrolyte imbalances. A neurovascular profile represented the highest prevalence of cerebrovascular disease, paralysis, myocardial infarction and peripheral vascular disease. Relative to the common profile, the lifestyle profile was associated with a 15% longer length of stay (LOS) and 12% greater cost, the renal profile was associated with a 30% higher risk of death, 27% longer LOS and 24% greater cost, and the neurovascular profile was associated with a 45% higher risk of death, 34% longer LOS and 37% greater cost (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Comorbidity profiles are helpful in identifying adults at higher risk of death, longer length of stay, and accumulating greater costs during hospitalizations for HF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available