4.0 Article

Evaluating home blood pressure in treated hypertensives in comparison with the referential value of casual screening of blood pressure: the Ohasama study

Journal

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 89-95

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328351de34

Keywords

antihypertensive drugs; corresponding criteria; general population; home blood pressure monitoring; reduced major axis regression

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [18390192, 18590587, 19590929, 19790423, 20590629, 21390201, 21591016, 22590767, 22790556, 22890017, 23249036, 23790242]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Health and Labor Sciences, Japan [H18-Junkankitou[Seishuu]-Ippan-012, H20-Junkankitou[Seishuu]-Ippan-009, 013, H23-Junkankitou[Senshuu]-Ippan-005]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  4. Japan Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund
  5. Biomedical Innovation Grants
  6. Miso Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan
  7. Sendai Knowledge Cluster Initiative, Sendai, Japan
  8. [18.54042]
  9. [19.7152]
  10. [20.7198]
  11. [20.7477]
  12. [20.54043]
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22890017, 23790242, 23390171] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The target home blood pressure (BP) levels for antihypertensive treatment have not been fully investigated. We estimated home BP values that corresponded to the referential values of casual screening of BP using reduced major axis (RMA) regression for data from untreated and treated individuals in a general population. Methods The study included 2651 participants (778 treated) aged 20 years or above. The relationships between casual BP and home BP were examined using RMA regression to consider measurement errors. We calculated estimated home BP values that corresponded to casual BP using the regression equations. Results Although casual BPs and home BPs were significantly correlated (all: P < 0.0001), the coefficients of determination in multiple regression were higher in untreated individuals than those in treated ones. When RMA regression was applied between casual BP (x) and morning home BP (y), the equations were expressed as y = 0.78x + 26.55 (systolic BP) and y = 0.84x + 14.34 (diastolic BP) in treated individuals and y = 0.79x + 19.29 (systolic BP) and y = 0.85x + 9.94 (diastolic BP) in untreated ones. The estimated home BPs corresponded to 140/90 mmHg of casual BP: 135.8/89.8 mmHg (morning), 132.2/86.6 mmHg (evening), and 133.9/87.8 mmHg (average) in treated individuals and 129.2/86.7 mmHg (morning), 127.8/84.8 mmHg (evening), and 128.2/85.2 mmHg (average) in untreated individuals. Conclusion We estimated the referential values of home BP in treated hypertensives using a regression model; however, further intervention studies on home BP are needed to clarify the target treatment goals of home BP. Blood Press Monit 17:89-95 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available