4.0 Article

Cross-modulatory effects of clopidogrel and heparin on platelet and fibrin incorporation in thrombosis

Journal

BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 593-598

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3283602a03

Keywords

anticoagulation; arterial thrombosis; mouse models; platelet inhibition; venous thrombosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB007582]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharmacologic inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation is a mainstay for reducing the incidence of arterial thrombosis, whereas anticoagulation is the primary approach for preventing the development of venous thrombosis. The effect of standard pharmacologic agents on their reciprocal vessel - anticoagulants on arterial thrombosis and platelet inhibitor on venous thrombosis - is relatively understudied. This study was designed to evaluate murine large-vessel arterial or venous thrombosis under conditions of either fibrin or platelet inhibition. In this study, heparin and clopidogrel were used as standard anticoagulant and platelet inhibitor, respectively, evaluating both large artery and vein thrombosis in mice, using in-vivo fluorescence imaging to simultaneously measure fibrin and platelet levels at the thrombus induction site. Heparin reduced both fibrin and platelet development in both arteries and veins, with stronger influences on fibrin accrual. Clopidogrel had a stronger effect in arteries, reducing both platelet and fibrin accumulation. Clopidogrel also reduced platelet accumulation with venous thrombosis, but the reductions in fibrin formation did not reach statistical significance. These findings illustrate the interactive role of platelet activity and coagulation in the development of large-vessel thrombosis, with inhibition of one thrombotic component showing profound effects on the other component in both arterial and venous thrombosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available