4.7 Article

Biological significance of HLA locus matching in unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages 1189-1197

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-604785

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [H23-Immunology-010, H26-Immunology-106]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT KAKENHI) [22133011]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22133011, 26293277, 26461455] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We hypothesized that the compatibility of each HLA loci between donor and patient induced divergent transplant-related immunologic responses, which attributed to the individualized manifestation of clinical outcomes. Here, we analyzed 7898 Japanese pairs transplanted with T-cell-replete marrow from an unrelated donor with complete HLA allele typing data. Multivariable competing risk regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relative risk (RR) of clinical outcomes after transplantation. A significant RR of HLA allele mismatch compared with match was seen with HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DPB1 for gradeIII-IV acute graft-versus-host disease(GVHD), and HLA-C for chronic GVHD. Of note, only HLA-C and HLA-DPB1 mismatch reduced leukemia relapse, and this graft-versus-leukemia effect of HLA-DPB1 was independent of chronic GVHD. HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 double (DRB1_DQB1) mismatch was revealed to be a significant RR for acute GVHD and mortality, whereas single mismatch was not. Thus, the number of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DPB1, and DRB1_DQB1 mismatches showed a clear-cut risk difference for acute GVHD, whereas the number of mismatches for HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1_DQB1 showed the same for mortality. In conclusion, we determined the biological response to HLA locus mismatch in transplant-related immunologic events, and provide a rationale for use of a personalized algorithm for unrelated donor selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available