4.7 Article

Significant mobilization of both conventional and regulatory T cells with AMD3100

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 25, Pages 6580-6590

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-359331

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  2. Yerkes National Primate Research Center [RR00165]
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences)
  4. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [DE018339, DE019397]
  5. [2U19 AI051731]
  6. [1 R01 HL095791]
  7. [2U24 RR018109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we used the rhesus macaque model to determine the impact that AMD3100 has on lymphocyte mobilization, both alone and in combination with G-CSF. Our results indicate that, unlike G-CSF, AMD3100 substantially mobilizes both B and T lymphocytes into the peripheral blood. This led to significant increases in the peripheral blood content of both effector and regulatory T-cell populations, which translated into greater accumulation of these cells in the resulting leukapheresis products. Notably, CD4(+)/CD25(high)/CD127(low)/FoxP3(+) Tregs were efficiently mobilized with AMD3100-containing regimens, with as much as a 4.0-fold enrichment in the leukapheresis product compared with G-CSF alone. CD8(+) T cells were mobilized to a greater extent than CD4(+) T cells, with accumulation of 3.7 +/- 0.4-fold more total CD8+ T cells and 6.2 +/- 0.4-fold more CD8(+) effector memory T cells in the leukapheresis product compared with G-CSF alone. Given that effector memory T-cell sub-populations may mediate less GVHD compared with other effector T-cell populations and that Tregs are protective against GVHD, our results indicate that AMD3100 may mobilize a GVHD-protective T-cell repertoire, which would be of benefit in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. (Blood. 2011;118(25):6580-6590)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available