4.7 Article

Chronic GVHD risk score: a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research analysis

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 117, Issue 24, Pages 6714-6720

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-323824

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [5U01HL069294]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH234200637015C]
  5. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0704, N00014-08-1-0058]
  6. AABB
  7. Allos Inc
  8. Amgen Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several risk factors are associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), but there is considerable variability in the reported factors. Therefore, we evaluated patient, transplantation, and cGVHD characteristics to develop a risk score in 5343 patients with cGVHD. Ten variables were identified as being significant in multivariate analysis of overall survival and nonrelapse mortality (NRM): age, prior acute GVHD, time from trans-plantation to cGVHD, donor type, disease status at transplantation, GVHD prophylaxis, gender mismatch, serum bilirubin, Karnofsky score, and platelet count. These 10 variables were used to build a cGVHD risk score, and 6 risk groups (RGs) were identified. The 5-year NRM was 5% (1%-9%) in RG1, 20% (19%-23%) in RG2, 33% (29%-37%) in RG3, 43% (40%-46%) in RG4, 63% (53%-74%) in RG5, and 72% (59%-85%) in RG6. The 5-year overall survival was highest at 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85%-97%) in RG1, followed by 67% (65%-69%) in RG2, 51% (46%-55%) in RG3, 40% (37%-43%) in RG4, 21% (12%-30%) in RG5, and 4% (0%-9%) in RG6 (all P < .01). This analysis demonstrates the usefulness of data from a large registry to develop risk-score categories for major transplantation outcomes. Validation of this cGVHD risk score is needed in a different population to ensure its broad applicability. (Blood. 2011;117(24):6714-6720)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available