4.6 Article

Low differentiated microvascular density and low expression of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) predict distant metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages E415-E423

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12191

Keywords

clear cell renal cell carcinoma; platelet-derived growth factor-BB; microvascular density; metastasis; prognosis; antiangiogenetic therapy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072090]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology commission [07JCYBJC17000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine the prognostic significance of the expression of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and differentiated microvascular density (MVD) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Patients and Methods We used the vascular marker cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) to identify tumour blood vessels. The expression of PDGF-BB and CD34 was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 100 ccRCCs. Prognostic effects of individual parameters were calculated using Cox regression models and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). Results Higher grade and more advanced stage ccRCCs had significantly less PDGF-BB expression and differentiated MVD (P < 0.05). Higher PDGF-BB expression was an independent prognostic factor for longer survival, and moreover, the final model built by the addition of PDGF-BB expression improved the predictive accuracy for disease-free survival (c-index 0.707) compared with the clinicopathological-based model (c-index 0.695). PDGF-BB expression was positively associated with differentiated MVD assessed by Spearman correlation and factor analysis (r = 0.634, P < 0.001). Conclusion PDGF-BB is as a novel and promising prognostic marker and antiangiogenic therapeutic target for the treatment of ccRCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available