4.6 Article

Urinary nerve growth factor level is correlated with the severity of neurological impairment in patients with cerebrovascular accident

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages 1158-1162

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08533.x

Keywords

nerve growth factor; detrusor overactivity; cerebrovascular accident

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To measure urinary nerve growth factor (uNGF, essential in nerve growth and regeneration) levels in patients with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), to determine whether uNGF could be a biomarker for predicting the neurological deficits in CVA, as the level of uNGF increases in patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (DO) and incontinence. PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS uNGF levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in normal subjects and patients with CVA and different severities of neurological impairment. Total uNGF levels were normalized to the concentration of urinary creatinine (uNGF/Cr). RESULTS The median (interquartile range) uNGF/Cr levels were significantly higher in patients, at 0.13 (0-1.04), than in normal subjects (undetectable). The uNGF/Cr levels correlated well with the severity of neurological impairment. Patients with none/minimal neurological impairment had no detectable uNGF/Cr level, like the controls. Patients with mild/moderate impairment had levels of 0.27 (0.09-0.8) and with severe impairment level of 1.53 (0.5-3.0) (both P < 0.001), significantly greater than that of none/minimal impairment or controls. However, uNGF/Cr levels were not correlated with age, location of CVA, multiplicity of CVA, duration of CVA, urodynamic findings or the presence of urge urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS The uNGF level is correlated with the severity of neurological impairment in patients with CVA but not with urge symptoms or urodynamic findings, suggesting elevated uNGF might be a result of the neurological lesion rather than lower urinary tract dysfunction in CVA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available