4.3 Article

Miniaturized Fluid Array for High-Throughput Protein Expression

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1590-1596

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.474

Keywords

protein expression; microfluidics; drug screening; proteomics; microarray

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) via Micro/Nano Fluidics Fundamentals Focus Center at the University of California at Irvine
  2. University of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a miniaturized fluid array device for high-throughput cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS), aiming to match the throughput and scale of gene discovery. Current practice of using E. coli cells for production of recombinant proteins is difficult and cost-prohibitive to implement in a high-throughput format. As more and more new genes are being identified, there is a considerable need to have high-throughput methods to produce a large number of proteins for studying structures and functions of the corresponding genes. The device consists of 96 units and each unit is for expression of one protein; thus up to 96 proteins can be produced simultaneously. The function of the fluid array was demonstrated by expression of a variety of proteins, with more than two orders of magnitude reduction in reagent consumption compared with a commercially available CFPS instrument. The protein expression yield in the device was up to 87 times higher for beta-glucoronidase than that in a conventional microplate. The concentration of beta-galactosidase expressed in the device was determined at 5.5 mu g/mu L. The feasibility of using the device for drug screening was demonstrated by measuring the inhibitory effects of mock drug compounds on synthesized beta-lactamase without the need for harvesting proteins, which enabled us to reduce the analysis time from days to hours. (C) 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 26: 1590-1596, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available