4.5 Article

A fast and sensitive method for quantifying lumefantrine and desbutyl-lumefantrine using LC-MS/MS

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.09.027

Keywords

Desbutyl-lumefantrine; Liquid chromatography; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Plasma; Plasmodium falciparum; Sensivity; Tandem mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. SIDA/SAREC through Makerere University/Karolinska Institute Research Collaboration in clinical pharmacology
  2. Swedish Research Council [VR 2011-3440, VR 2011-7381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for quantification of lumefantrine (LUM) and its metabolite desbutyl-lumefantrine (DBL) in human plasma. Sample preparation was done by protein precipitation using acetonitrile containing deuterated lumefantrine (LUM-d18) and desbutyl-lumefantrine (DBL-d9) as internal standards. Total chromatography time was 2.2 min using an Hypersil Gold C18 column (20 x 2.1 mm, 1.9 mu m), with a gradient using 0.5% formic acid in water (mobile phase A) and 0.5% formic acid in methanol (mobile phase B) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mass spectrometric quantification was performed in positive electro spray ionization (ESI+) mode using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Measuring range was 21-529 ng/mL for LUM and 1.9-47 ng/mL for DBL in plasma. Inter- and intra-assay precision was within +/- 10% coefficient of variation (CV) for all levels of both LUM and DBL. Accuracy was within +/- 10% for all levels of both LUM and DBL. This method requires 100 mu L plasma volume and its short retention times allow a high throughput. Samples were stable for a week at +5 degrees C and up to six months -20 degrees C. The method was successfully applied for plasma LUM and DBL determination in children under 5 years of age with uncomplicated malaria, up to 28 days after a standard 3-day treatment with artemether-lumefantrine. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available