4.6 Review

Oxygen transfer characteristics of miniaturized bioreactor systems

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages 1005-1019

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24824

Keywords

minibioreactors; microbioreactors; oxygen transfer; oxygen monitoring

Funding

  1. UK Joint Infrastructure Fund (JIF), EPSRC [GR/N66551/01]
  2. UK Joint Infrastructure Fund (JIF)
  3. Department of Biochemical Engineering, UCL
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I00484X/1, BB/J020605/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H049479/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/J020605/1, BB/I00484X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. EPSRC [EP/H049479/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since their introduction in 2001 miniaturized bioreactor systems have made great advances in function and performance. In this article the dissolved oxygen (DO) transfer performance of submilliliter microbioreactors, and 110mL minibioreactors was examined. Microbioreactors have reached kLa values of 460h1, and are offering instrumentation and some functionality comparable to production systems, but at high throughput screening volumes. Minibioreactors, aside from one 1,440h1 kLa system, have not offered as high rates of DO transfer, but have demonstrated superior integration with automated fluid handling systems. Microbioreactors have been typically limited to studies with E. coli, while minibioreactors have offered greater versatility in this regard. Further, mathematical relationships confirming the applicability of kLa measurements across all scales have been derived, and alternatives to fluorescence lifetime DO sensors have been evaluated. Finally, the influence on reactor performance of oxygen uptake rate (OUR), and the possibility of its real-time measurement have been explored. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 10051019. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available