4.6 Article

Protein A chromatography increases monoclonal antibody aggregation rate during subsequent low pH virus inactivation hold

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1415, Issue -, Pages 83-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.068

Keywords

Aggregation; IgG; Size exclusion chromatography; Affinity adsorption; Unfolding pH

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. EPSRC
  3. Bioprocessing Research Industry Club (BRIC) initiative Doctorate Programme [BB/J003832/1]
  4. UCB Celltech
  5. BBSRC [BB/K021354/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1128624, BB/K021354/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein A chromatography is a near-ubiquitous method of inAb capture in bioprocesses. The use of low pH buffer for elution from protein A is known to contribute to product aggregation. Yet, a more limited set of evidence suggests that low pH may not be the sole cause of aggregation in protein A chromatography, rather, other facets of the process may contribute significantly. This paper presents a well-defined method for investigating this problem. An IgG4 was incubated in elution buffer after protein A chromatography (typical of the viral inactivation hold) and the quantity of monomer in neutralised samples was determined by size exclusion chromatography; elution buffers of different pH values predetermined to induce aggregation of the IgG4 were used. Rate constants for monomer decay over time were determined by fitting exponential decay functions to the data. Similar experiments were implemented in the absence of a chromatography step, i.e. IgG4 aggregation at low pH. Rate constants for aggregation after protein A chromatography were considerably higher than those from low pH exposure alone; a distinct shift in aggregation rates was apparent across the pH range tested. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available